Quaestio
All sample reports

Sample audit

Consumer goods sustainability report

Unilever — sustainability and impact reporting

Open the original document

This sample is stored deliberately to show the report format. Documents you audit yourself are processed in memory and never saved.

52% complete

Epistemic Completeness Score — 52% · Partially Contextualised

Verdict

The report is professionally produced and internally consistent, but its headline progress claims are measured against boundaries the authors chose: operational emissions (scopes 1 and 2) feature prominently while the value-chain emissions (scope 3) that dominate the company's footprint are reported separately and without a headline trajectory. Packaging and sourcing commitments are stated as directional goals with interim milestones missed or re-baselined in earlier cycles — a pattern visible only when previous years' reports are read alongside this one.

Metric: Emissions reduction and packaging commitmentsTimeframe: Multi-year programme, self-selected base yearScope: Global operations and value chainRuntime: 23.1s

01 / Boundary

Boundary sensitivity

46

Would shifting the start or end date change the trend?

The headline reduction claim holds only within the operational boundary; the full value-chain boundary, which is materially larger, shows slower progress.

Baseline used
Operational (scope 1 and 2) emissions boundary for headline claims
Defensible alternative
Full value-chain (scope 3) boundary, which the company itself reports elsewhere in the document

02 / Confounders

Confounder accounting

50

Which secondary drivers went unmentioned?

Portfolio disposals and volume changes affect intensity metrics but are not separated from genuine efficiency gains.

  • —Scope 3 emissions trajectory absent from headline claims
  • —Divestment effects on reported intensity
  • —Earlier-cycle targets re-baselined rather than reported as missed

03 / Uncertainty

Uncertainty fidelity

58

Were confidence intervals and caveats preserved?

Interim goals are stated as commitments; where earlier milestones were missed, the language shifts to directional ambition without flagging the change.

Counter-perspectives

  • Carbon Brief — corporate climate target assessments

    Independent assessments of consumer-sector climate targets find scope-3 exclusion and re-baselining to be common patterns that materially change headline progress claims.

    Carbon Brief

  • GHG Protocol — scope guidance

    The reference accounting standard makes clear that value-chain emissions typically dominate for consumer goods companies — the boundary question is not a technicality.

    GHG Protocol

Run this on your own document

Your first three audits are free. Paste text, upload a file or drop in a link.

Start free