Quaestio examines reports and evidence-based claims for potentially missing context, alternative explanations and uncertainty — with sources you can check.
3 free credits · no card · your document is never stored
Real audit · Deep Dive
Completeness score
Partially Contextualised
The report’s headline figure
A projected electricity supply margin of 5.9 GW.
What Quaestio flagged
The audit identifies 0.7 GW of that margin as a modelling change, not additional physical capacity — context worth checking before interpreting the improvement.
0
documents stored
3
axes of omission
100%
cited counter-evidence
<30s
typical audit run
The scoring model
Every audit returns a 0–100 score per axis, an explicit assessment, and citations you can check yourself.
Detects baselines chosen to flatter a trend, and names the defensible alternative window that would change the conclusion.
Surfaces the secondary drivers a document credits to nothing — policy shifts, base effects, composition changes.
Checks whether confidence intervals, sample limits and stated caveats survived into the headline claim.
Four stages, one request
Nothing is queued, cached or saved. Each audit runs end-to-end in a single request and then ceases to exist.
Paste text, upload a PDF, or point at a web link. Extraction runs inside your browser — the file itself never leaves your machine.
Claims are broken into their empirical parameters. Company names, people and case numbers are stripped before anything leaves the session.
Only the abstract, de-identified queries reach independent search — hunting published evidence that contradicts or complicates the claim.
A scored dial, an explicit assessment per axis, and 3–4 counter-perspectives with citations you can open and check yourself.
Sample output
An illustrative excerpt from a financial report audit. Every real finding ships with the source it came from, linked.
The claimed 34% improvement starts from an artificially depressed base year. Measured from the five-year average, the improvement is 9%.
Sector statistical bulletin · 2025
The turnaround is attributed to the new strategy alone. A sector-wide pricing recovery in the same window explains roughly half the gain.
Industry review series · 2025
The headline states a single 2030 target with no sensitivity range. Comparable programmes vary by a factor of three under plausible assumptions.
Independent evaluation meta-analysis
Built for
Quaestio is for anyone who has to trust a number they didn't calculate.
Pressure-test whitepapers, impact assessments and consultation responses before they reach a decision.
Audit press releases and corporate statements for the context that was carefully left out.
Stress-test syntheses and literature claims against independent published evidence.
Read a quarterly report twice — once for what it says, once for what it doesn't.
Stateless by construction
Text is held in memory for the duration of a single request and discarded when the response returns. PDFs are parsed inside your own browser — the file itself never leaves your machine. Only de-identified query strings reach any search index, and we keep nothing but a timestamp and a runtime figure.
Auditing a web page? The fetched text is processed the same way — never saved.
Start with 3 free credits. No credit card. Bring a quarterly report, a policy paper, or the paragraph that felt a little too tidy.
Standard audit: 1 credit · Deep Dive: 3 credits · no document retention